Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 10:39:44AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Is this going to be extended? If not I think it should be erased.
> Hmmm, do we want to be able to rename a flex inset to one of another
> type, through a dialogue? Branch and Note have this.
OK, if that is the only reason, it can go. I am no fan of these
serialized params passing.
> The dialogue is lacking and I don't think I'm going to write it. So if
> everything still works after deleting it, let it go :-)